XPeng IRON (Gen 2) vs HUBO-2 Plus

Compare XPeng IRON (Gen 2) (Xpeng) and HUBO-2 Plus (Rainbow Robotics) side by side: degrees of freedom, weight, payload, battery life, actuators, and status.

Specification comparison
SpecXPeng IRON (Gen 2)HUBO-2 Plus
ManufacturerXpengRainbow Robotics
CategoryHumanoidHumanoid
CountryChinaSouth Korea
Degrees of freedom4041
Weight (kg)7060
Battery life (h)42
Payload15 kg10 kg
Max speed1.8 m/s1.2 m/s
ActuatorsBionic Electromechanical ActuatorsCable-Driven Joint Actuators
Primary sensorMulti-Camera Vision + IMU + TactileStereo Camera + IMU + Force Sensors
FunctionAssembly & manufacturingResearch & development
Released20252011
StatusTestingActive

Verdict

XPeng IRON (Gen 2) leads on 3 of the 4 weighted dimensions both makers disclose.

XPeng IRON (Gen 2) leads on payload (15 kg vs 10 kg), max speed (1.8 m/s vs 1.2 m/s) and battery life (4 h vs 2 h).

HUBO-2 Plus leads on degrees of freedom (41 vs 40).

Left out because at least one manufacturer does not publish a figure: price.

XPeng IRON (Gen 2)

Highly anthropomorphic humanoid with bionic spine and skin, powered by XPeng's Turing AI chips and VLA brain stack. Mass production targeted for 2026.

HUBO-2 Plus

Commercialized KAIST HUBO platform with Samsung's 35% stake. DARPA Robotics Challenge winner lineage. Used by research labs worldwide including MIT and Google.

Full reference

All robot comparisons · Robot Reference