XPeng IRON (Gen 2) vs Qinglong

Compare XPeng IRON (Gen 2) (Xpeng) and Qinglong (Shanghai Humanoid Robotics Innovation Center) side by side: degrees of freedom, weight, payload, battery life, actuators, and status.

Specification comparison
SpecXPeng IRON (Gen 2)Qinglong
ManufacturerXpengShanghai Humanoid Robotics Innovation Center
CategoryHumanoidHumanoid
CountryChinaChina
Degrees of freedom4043
Weight (kg)7080
Battery life (h)43
Payload15 kg15 kg
Max speed1.8 m/s1.5 m/s
ActuatorsBionic Electromechanical ActuatorsHigh-Torque Modular Actuators
Primary sensorMulti-Camera Vision + IMU + TactileMulti-Camera + LiDAR + IMU
FunctionAssembly & manufacturingResearch & development
Released20252024
StatusTestingTesting

Verdict

XPeng IRON (Gen 2) leads on 2 of the 3 weighted dimensions both makers disclose.

XPeng IRON (Gen 2) leads on max speed (1.8 m/s vs 1.5 m/s) and battery life (4 h vs 3 h).

Qinglong leads on degrees of freedom (43 vs 40).

Left out because at least one manufacturer does not publish a figure: price.

XPeng IRON (Gen 2)

Highly anthropomorphic humanoid with bionic spine and skin, powered by XPeng's Turing AI chips and VLA brain stack. Mass production targeted for 2026.

Qinglong

China's first open-source full-size general-purpose humanoid platform, unveiled at WAIC 2024. Designed as a national reference platform for embodied AI research.

Full reference

All robot comparisons · Robot Reference