Agibot A2 Ultra vs XPeng IRON (Gen 2)

Compare Agibot A2 Ultra (Agibot) and XPeng IRON (Gen 2) (Xpeng) side by side: degrees of freedom, weight, payload, battery life, actuators, and status.

Specification comparison
SpecAgibot A2 UltraXPeng IRON (Gen 2)
ManufacturerAgibotXpeng
CategoryHumanoidHumanoid
CountryChinaChina
Degrees of freedom4040
Weight (kg)6970
Battery life (h)24
Payload10 kg15 kg
Max speed1.5 m/s1.8 m/s
ActuatorsForce-Adaptive Servo ActuatorsBionic Electromechanical Actuators
Primary sensor3D LiDAR + RGB-D Camera + IMUMulti-Camera Vision + IMU + Tactile
FunctionSocial interactionAssembly & manufacturing
Released20252025
StatusActiveTesting

Verdict

XPeng IRON (Gen 2) leads on 4 of the 4 weighted dimensions both makers disclose.

XPeng IRON (Gen 2) leads on price (TBD (mass prod 2026) vs $100,000–$190,000), payload (15 kg vs 10 kg), max speed (1.8 m/s vs 1.5 m/s) and battery life (4 h vs 2 h).

Agibot A2 Ultra

Full-size service humanoid with Guinness-record long-distance walking capability. Designed for reception, tours, and customer service in commercial environments.

XPeng IRON (Gen 2)

Highly anthropomorphic humanoid with bionic spine and skin, powered by XPeng's Turing AI chips and VLA brain stack. Mass production targeted for 2026.

Full reference

All robot comparisons · Robot Reference