Hyodol vs Microduck

Compare Hyodol (Hyodol Co.) and Microduck (Pollen Robotics (Hugging Face)) side by side: degrees of freedom, weight, payload, battery life, actuators, and status.

Specification comparison
SpecHyodolMicroduck
ManufacturerHyodol Co.Pollen Robotics (Hugging Face)
CategorySpecialtySpecialty
CountrySouth KoreaFrance
Degrees of freedom015
Weight (kg)1.50.78
Battery life (h)81
PayloadN/A (companion)
Max speedN/A (stationary)
ActuatorsNone (stationary companion)
Primary sensorMicrophone + Touch Sensors + CameraCamera + 8x8 ToF LiDAR + 2 IMUs
FunctionCompanionshipEducational biped for RL policy training and interactive play
Released20192026
StatusActiveActive

Verdict

Microduck leads on 2 of the 3 weighted dimensions both makers disclose.

Hyodol leads on battery life (8 h vs 1 h).

Microduck leads on price ($399 vs ~$1,200) and degrees of freedom (15 vs 0).

Left out because at least one manufacturer does not publish a figure: payload and max speed.

Hyodol

AI doll companion robot for lonely elderly. Features ChatGPT-powered voice conversation, medication reminders, and emergency alerts. Over 12,000 units deployed in Korea.

Microduck

A 25 cm tall open-source biped robot from Pollen Robotics (Hugging Face) designed for reinforcement learning and play. It ships with 7 pre-trained behaviors including walking, sitting/standing, kicking, grasping with its beak, and self-righting, all deployable from simulation.

Full reference

All robot comparisons · Robot Reference